User talk:Mike Peel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.

If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Silesian Park 2024 079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Silesian Park 2024 080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 15:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 12:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 17:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kingston upon Hull 2024 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Hardwick Hall 2024 158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 17:44, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At College Court, University of Leicester 2024 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:44, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Silesian Park 2024 082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:38, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Silesian Park 2024 083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 20:27, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 01:59, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:At Jodrell Bank Observatory 2024 009.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for the new version. I wait for a second opinion.

Unfortunately (I hope I am wrong), I suspect that something is wrong with your camera or lens. When I read the EXIF ​​information, everything seems perfectly normal, sensible settings and post-processing. The image should have a large depth of field (18mm and f/8). According to the data from the camera, everything from 2.18 meters to infinity is in focus (I used https://www.metadata2go.com/view-metadata to view the information). The blur and lack of detail is hard to understand.

Best regards ArildV (talk) 20:50, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I'm fairly sure it's the JPEG compression... I discovered this and turned it back to RAW recently, File:At Basildon Park 2024 01.jpg and photos 1-20 in that series are back with RAW again, and I think they're OK? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:54, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 19:16, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 10:53, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cagliari 2024 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 19:16, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jodrell Bank Observatory 2024 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:33, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jodrell Bank Observatory 2024 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 11:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:54, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:36, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 14:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Basildon Park 2024 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 09:39, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Noordwijk 2024 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 09:13, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Basildon Park 2024 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:33, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Basildon Park 2024 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 09:16, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Basildon Park 2024 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 23:56, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Basildon Park 2024 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Basildon Park 2024 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 12:08, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 355.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Shougissime 18:40, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]